Glucose versus lactate in immature brain slices

Related Q&A: Y Ben-Ari writes that ‘Zilberter and Bregestovski and colleagues’ dealt with ‘ketone body metabolites’. What does ketone body metabolite mean? ”

About this post

1. These quotes were first used by Elly Strammer at F1000.com. After she agreed to remove her post from there, she contacted us suggesting that we use the quotes. We thank Elly for her contribution and for further commenting at the Naturally Selected

2. We received many questions regarding this post, quite a few of them concerned the formatting, which was not helping to clearly understand the issue. Because of that, we updated the post making sure to visually indicate quotes belonging to the arguing sides (according to F1000.comNow, remarks related to comments concerning the works of Y. Zilberter et al. are marked as  and remarks by Y. Ben-Ari are marked as 

 ”We demonstrate that in the neonatal brain, Em [membrane potential] and EGABA [reversal potential of GABA-induced anionic currents] strongly depend on composition of the energy substrate pool. Complementing glucose with ketone bodies, pyruvate or lactate resulted in a significant hyperpolarization of both Em and EGABA, and induced a radical shift in the mode of GABAergic synaptic transmission towards network inhibition.” (1)

“The main conclusions of our work are that the inhibitory effect of L-lactate on GDPs is not mediated by mitochondrial energy metabolism, and that glucose at its standard 10 mM concentration is an adequate energy substrate for neonatal neurons in vitro.” (2)

 ”We show that in the presence of glucose, lactate is effectively utilized as an energy substrate, causing an augmentation of oxidative metabolism. Moreover, in the absence of glucose lactate is fully capable of maintaining synaptic function. Therefore, during network activity in neonatal slices, lactate can be an efficient energy substrate capable of sustaining and enhancing aerobic energy metabolism.” (3)

“Lactate is not an efficient replacement for glucose and, as in vivo glucose is always kept at 4-5mM in the brain even in conditions of severe stress.” (4 a)

“The fact is, in the extracellular fluid (ECF) in the brain, glucose concentration is between 1.9 mM and 0.59 while lactate concentration is between 5.1 mM and 0.78 mM (for review, see [9 in this post]). The question arises: why 10 mM glucose in standard ACSF is adequate but 10 mM lactate is not.” (5)

“Clearly, the suggestions of Zilberter and colleagues rely on wrong assumptions and results that have not been reproduced.” (4 a)

“The effect of weak acids on GABA reversal potential and GDP generation was initially described for 4-5 mM concentrations of BHB [ketone body beta-hydroxybutyrate] (Rheims et al. 2009 ), lactate and pyruvate (Holmgren et al. 2010), and was later confirmed by independent research groups for similar concentrations of pyruvate (Tyzio et al. 2011), lactate and propionate (Ruusuvuori et al. 2010).” (6)

“From a clinical perspective, it is interesting to stress that relying on their observations on the positive actions of lactate on metabolism, Zilberter and colleagues have suggested that administration of lactate may be “a novel therapeutic tool to cure Parkinson, Alzheimer, Leigh syndrome and epilepsies” (4a)

 From Brain Fuels: This quotation is taken out of context. The exact piece from (9) reads: “… a growing body of evidence shows that metabolic stress caused by impaired energy homeostasis is a common feature of neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs) such as Alzheimer disease, Leigh syndrome, epilepsy, dementia, multiple sclerosis, neuropathies or ataxias [88] and [89]. We speculate that endogenous ES such as lactate, BHB and pyruvate or their combinations can be efficient in treatingNDD, and would address the cause rather than symptoms. Indeed, the neuroprotective effects of pyruvate have been repeatedly demonstrated in cases of brain ischemia, hypoglycemia, hemorragia, stroke and kainate-inducedepileptic brain damage[90], [91], [92]and [93]. Further research into mechanisms of the effects of ES on fundamental neuronal properties might allow more rapid progress in preventing and managing NDDs.

The comment made on 29 Jul 2011 (4 b) quoted this paragraph with the references removed thus attributing the text solely to (9).

“Considering the compelling and well-known clinical observation that high lactate level is a classical sign of neuron suffering and severe conditions that require rapid intervention, this suggestion is, to say the least, astonishing.” (4 a)

“The bulk of the evidence suggests that lactate is an important intermediary in numerous metabolic processes, a particularly mobile fuel for aerobic metabolism, and perhaps a mediator of redox state among various compartments both within and between cells. Lactate can no longer be considered the usual suspect for metabolic ‘crimes’, but is instead a central player in cellular, regional and whole body metabolism… we might term the period from the 1930s to approximately the early 1970s the dead-end waste product era.” (7)

” It is curious that Dr Zilberter and colleagues refer to metabolism but have never reported measuring it.” (4 b)

“…Ivanov et al. (2011) simultaneously recorded oxygen tension, NAD(P)H fluorescence transients and local field potentials during electrical stimulation of the hippocampal Schaffer collateral pathway in neonatal brain tissue slices from mice. From the very beginning, the authors took great care to ensure both viability and functionality of their preparations. They convincingly demonstrated that surprisingly high superfusion rates with standard artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) in the slice chamber are required to ensure adequate oxygenation and complete electrical function in blood-free tissue slices. An important implication of this methodological tour de force is that under many previously reported experiments the requirements for viability may been met while the functionality may have been compromised.” (8)

References

  1. Holmgren, C. D., Mukhtarov, M., Malkov, A. E., Popova, I. Y., Bregestovski, P., and Zilberter, Y. (2010). Energy substrate availability as a determinant of neuronal resting potential, GABA signaling and spontaneous network activity in the neonatal cortex in vitro. J. Neurochem. 112, 900–912.
  2. Ruusuvuori E et al. (2010). Spontaneous network events driven by depolarizing GABA action in neonatal hippocampal slices are not attributable to deficient mitochondrial energy metabolism. J Neurosci. Nov 17; 30(46):15638-42
  3. Ivanov A, Mukhtarov M, Bregestovski P and Zilberter Y (2011) Lactate effectively covers energy demands during neuronal network activity in neonatal hippocampal slices. Front. Neuroenerg. 3:2.
  4. Ben-Ari Y.  a) Faculty of 1000, 06 Jan 2011, evaluation,  b) 29 Jul 2011, comment.
  5. Zilberter Y. Faculty of 1000, 19 May 2011 and July 14 2011, comments.
  6. Khakhalin A (May 18, 2011). Questioning the depolarizing effects of GABA during early brain development. J Neurophysiol doi: 0.1152/jn.00293.2011.
  7. Mendel I. Faculty of 1000, 04 Jun 2011, comment (Currently the comment is removed).
  8. Kasischke K (2011) Lactate fuels the neonatal brain. Front. Neuroenerg. 3:4. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2011.00004
  9. Zilberter Y, Zilberter T, Bregestovski P. (2010) Neuronal activity in vitro and the in vivo reality: the role of energy homeostasis. Trends PharmacolSci 31:394–401.

LTP induction and AMPA

Neuroscience FAQ, Q&A — Tags: , — 8:10 am

 

Q&A and FAQ (archived) :: Ongoing Q&A :: Neuroscience Q&A and FAQ

QUESTION 1: When you say ‘LTP induction’, does it mean increasing number of AMPA receptors?
Sujin
ANSWER 1:Hi Sujin,Long-term potentiation (LTP) is considered a neuronal analog of memory so I do not think that “increasing number of AMPA receptors” fully describes the process. The trafficking of AMPA receptors to synapses is thought to be one of mechanisms. During LTP induction, there is an increased delivery of AMPA receptors to synaptically active regions without changes in receptor affinity (1), by exocytosis to stimulated spines (2). This delivery precedes the full expression of LTP (3).

I suggest that you read the latest review article “AMPA receptor regulation during synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and neocortex” in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.06.007.

Sources

1. J Physiol, 2004, 559, 543-554

2. PNAS, 2010 vol. 107, 36, 15951-15956

3. PNAS, 2008 vol. 105, 32, 11388-11393

QUESTION 2 : First of all, thank you very much.

But I am curious about this… you mean AMPA receptors were already made, stored in somewhere and when it is needed, go to synaptically active regions?

If I am right, where were they stored in?

p.s I can’t speak English very well. I hope you understand.

ANSWER 2: I perfectly understand you, don’t worry.

Most of AMPA receptors are located within neuronal cytoplasm. As to their expression, there’s, for example, a special protein (NSF) involved in neurotransmitter release from the presynaptic terminal that binds to the GluR2 subunit of AMPA and regulates surface expression of AMPA receptors. It can get too complicated to give you more details and I am not sure about the level of your basic knowledge so please don’t hesitate telling me more about your interest.

 

Tanya Zilberter


Dream control, conscious dreaming

Q&A and FAQ (archived) :: Ongoing Q&A :: Neuroscience Q&A and FAQ

Question

First of all, thank you for your time. I realize that this is on a volunteer basis and that you do this for nothing but smiles. Thank you.

Now,I have recently begun getting interested in Lucid Dreaming, after having experienced it a few times, and am now trying to practice it to where I can do it every night. Since sleeping is when your brain organizes information, can shaping my dreams to my will stop that process?

Also, I’ve read that there are “practical” applications of Lucid Dreaming, but all of them seem to be about nightmare therapy or some other type of therapy.

My question here being: Could you use Lucid Dreaming to practice something in a “real life” application that you learned early in the day?

Answer

Dear Ryan,

First of all, you might want to read my answer to a similar question, although connected to a difference situation, in the blog post Lucid dream – sleep or wakefulness? As to the practical application, there indeed are quite a few techniques and interesting researches. For instance, lucid and control dreams were associated with all electronic media use but most strongly with video game play (Electronic media and lucid-control dreams: Morning after reports. By Gackenbach, J. Dreaming, Vol 19(1), Mar 2009, 1-6). You might read a full text, not too technical commentary on “The neurobiology of consciousness: Lucid dreaming wakes up” by J. Allan Hobson. However, the scholarly conclusion is so far that there’s a “poor reliability of lucid dream induction techniques (for a review, see Price & Cohen (1988). Lucid dream induction. An empirical evaluation. In: Conscious mind, sleeping brain.Perspectives on lucid dreaming (pp. 105-134). NY: Plenum Press).

If however you don’t need scientifically proved methods, there’s anecdotal evidence of control upon dream content, for instance, in the Silva Method, which is essentially guided imagery.

To your question whether it can stop the processing of information in the brain, I am not aware of reliable research results confirming this idea. I’ll double-check it and if I’m wrong, I’ll update my answer.

Tanya Zilberter

What can be done to fight off Alzheimer’s disease?

Q&A and FAQ (archived) :: Ongoing Q&A :: Neuroscience Q&A and FAQ

Question
I’ve read on WebMD that there’s no evidence that anything can be done to fight off Alzheimer’s disease. But I also read the opposite opinions. What is yours? – Donna

Answer
Dear Donna,

You probably mean the following conclusion cited by WebMD:

“There is currently no evidence considered to be of even moderate scientific quality supporting the association of any modifiable factor (nutritional supplements, herbal preparations, dietary factors, prescription or nonprescription drugs, social or economic factors, medical conditions, toxins, environmental exposures) with reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease,” concludes the report, issued by a National Institutes of Health consensus panel on Alzheimer’s prevention.”

I am surprised that they haven’t mentioned exercise, for which, in my humble opinion, a solid body of evidence exists and the caffein research, for which intricate mechanisms are being researched. Also, quite a few harmful influences such as hydrogen peroxide, glutamate, zinc, and copper/cysteine were convincingly reported. I added caffein effects on another neurodegenerative disease, the Parkinson’s but I know of similar studies in Alzheimer’s.

Walking away from dementia

Coffee, tea, and chocolate can help to avoid Parkinson’s disease

Pyruvate protects neurons against A-beta peptides characteristic for Alzheimer’s
Tanya Zilberter

Do we subconsciously know the time?

Q&A and FAQ (archived) :: Ongoing Q&A :: Neuroscience Q&A and FAQ

Question

Do we subconsciously know the time? Some people reported experiences which may show evidence to that.
Also, I heard that some people with mental disorders such as autism can tell time without a clock.

This may be due to brain mutations causing some of the subconscious to be “elevated”, if you will, into the *conscious* mind.

Also, some people can wake up without an alarm clock, which also supports this theory in my view.

Is any of my information correct? Do you agree with any of my ideas?

Please explain this in more depth. Thanks.

Answer

Hello,

You asked at least two questions and I’ll answer what I know about time perception in autistic people (not so easy to find on the Net) and suggest you some reading for the working with subconscious.

1. Time perception

There’s anecdotal evidence of the increased attention drive in people with autism. It can explain some of the (also anecdotal) evidence regarding their unusual memory, computation, decision making or image recognition abilities. However, not all autistics are created equal; because of that, researchers talk about Autistic Spectrum Disorders. Some people with ADS have IQs high enough and are communicative enough to perform in psychometric tests, but some are not and we know little about this group’s abilities.

As to the time perception, researchers talk about different parameters. For example, Drs Wallace and Happe at Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, UK (Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2, 2008, 447–455), studied three of them (quote):

a) Time estimation: Using a stopwatch, the experimenter says ‘‘Go’’ and ‘‘Stop’’ after the passage of a pre-designated time period (e.g., 45 s) and subsequently asks the participant to estimate how much time has passed.

b) Time production: The participant is asked to say ‘‘Go’’ and ‘‘Stop’’ when s/he thinks a designated amount of time (e.g., 12 s) has passed.

c) Time reproduction: The experimenter says ‘‘Go’’ and ‘‘Stop’’ after a pre-designated time passage, and then requests the participant to copy this time passage by saying ‘‘Go’’ and ‘‘Stop’’. (unquote).

Perception of shorter periods of time has been investigated previously (Br J Psychology, 95, 2004 269–282). This study showed that people with ASD are somewhat deficient in reproducing intervals of  of 2–3 seconds.

2. Subconscious <-> conscious

It’s a huge theme! There are tons of stunning information about phenomena concerning the two-way exchange, some of which is considered normal, some not. The basis for difficulties of this exchange in normal conditions is similar (I think) to the process of forgetting. Is forgetting bad? In many cases, yes, but normally, it is absolutely necessary for brain’s functioning.

The cases of inability to forget are descried (for example, the brilliant book by Alexander Luria “The Mind of a Mnemonist: A Little Book about a Vast Memory”). The mind of such people seems to be quite different and their lives are not easy. Looks like people are better off when they respect the normal barrier between these two ways of our mind’s operation. Remember “Be Careful What You Pray for … You just Might Get It”?

However, some of practical psychotechniques can be helpful. I tried the Silva method (The Silva Mind Control Method ) and found it rational. I am aware of the subliminal methods, BTW, extremely successful in the advertising industry.

Read more:
Working with the subconscious (search results)
The Silva method
The Mind of a Mnemonist

F1000 and the lactate controversy

Q&A and FAQ (archived) :: Ongoing Q&A :: Neuroscience Q&A and FAQ

Question: Hi Tanya,

I am fascinated by development at the Faculty of 1000 started by Y. Ben-Ari. I couldn’t contain myself and posted a comment there. However, I felt a little out of place being just a student arguing with a real scientist. So I still have a couple of questions to ask you.

1. Y Ben-Ari writes there that “Zilberter and Bregestovski and colleagues” dealt with “ketone body metabolites”. What does ketone body metabolite mean? From the articles (Rheims et al., 2009; Holmgren et al., 2010) Y. Ben-Ari refers, I could only find beta-hydroxybutyrate and basing on my textbook, I thought that ketone bodies are metabolized in the brain resulting in CO2, HCO3- and acetone.”]

2. Y Ben-ari argues with your statement and here’s his exact words: “Zilberter and colleagues have suggested that administration of lactate may be “a novel therapeutic tool to cure Parkinson, Alzheimer, Leigh syndrome and epilepsies”. What did you mean the “tool to cure”?

Thank you!

Ingrid

Answer: Hi Ingrid,

The phrase “ketone body metabolites” is used very scarcely and I’ll give you exact usage of it, then I’ll explain what you probably know already from your textbook.

From those authors who use this phrase, most of them refer to the work of Miles et al. (1), the accurate quote of which is: “ketone body metabolites (CO2, bicarbonate and acetone)” (1). Fontain et al. (2) mention ketone bodies metabolites listing them as beta-hydroxybutyric acid and acetoacetic acid, which is not exactly accurate since they both are ketone bodies themselves.

Other than that, the phrase has a different meaning, like this: “Fatty acids and their ketone body metabolites may serve as afferent signals to modulate food intake” (3). Clearly, ketone bodies are meant as metabolites of fatty acids, again a textbook information.

A citation from very recent reference (4): “Ketone bodies, as described here, comprise acetoacetic acid (AcAc), D-3-hydroxy-n-butyric acid (3HB), and acetone.” Note that they are ketone bodies, not ketone body metabolites.

Now, from the textbook (5): In muscle and brain, ketone bodies yield ATP + CO2 (p. 905); Acetoacetate  + H2O -> Acetone + HCO3- (p. 920)

None of the the two articles Y Ben-Ari refers to in his evaluation concerns anything other than beta-hydroxybutyrate, not other ketone bodies, not ATP, CO2 or HCO3-, or acetone.

As to your question number 2, text concerning “therapeutic” might be from (6): “Our hypothesis predicts that the adequate delivery of energy substrates may interrupt this pathological spiral of events and provide therapeutic options targeting the cause of pathologies rather than their symptoms”. However, there’s nothing wrong with this statement  even as it’s cited (excluding of course the words “cure”, which I can hardly imaging being in the Zilberter and coauthors’ vocabulary) and many authors describe and discuss metabolic crisis in connection with neurodegenerative diseases.

1. Miles J et al., (1980) Determination of 14C radioactivity in ketone bodies: a new, simplified method and its validation. J Lipid Res, 21, 646-650.

2. Fontaine M et al. (1996) Acylcarnitine removal in a patient with acyl-CoA beta-oxidation deficiency disorder: effect of L-carnitine therapy and starvation Clinica Chimica Acta 252; 109-122

3. Bray GA “A Guide to Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome: Origins and Treatment” CRC Press, 2011.

4. Sass JO (2011). Inborn errors of ketogenesis and ketone body utilization. J Inherit Metab Dis DOI 10.1007/s10545-011-9324-6

5. Lehninger, A. L. (2005). in Principles of Biochemistry, 4th Edn, eds D. L. Nelson and M. M. Cox (W. H. Freeman),

690–740.

6. Holmgren, C. D., Mukhtarov, M., Malkov, A. E., Popova, I. Y., , P., and Zilberter, Y. 2010). Energy substrate availability as a determinant of neuronal resting potential, GABA signaling and spontaneous network activity n the neonatal cortex in vitro. J. Neurochem. 112, 900–912.

“Sweet slices are fine” – really?

Neuroscience FAQ, Q&A — 7:08 am

Q&A and FAQ (archived) :: Ongoing Q&A :: About these Q&A

Question: Hi Tanya, I’ve read your recent entry to the blog brainfuels.com/2011/05/sweet-and-sour-recipes… and am lookin’ forward to reading the  rest in the series. My question is, is the “GABA scandal” finally resolved? Asking because so far, you haven’t mentioned this aspect.

Than you, Ingrid

Answer: Hi Ingrid,

The bottom line might look like this: the authors of the three articles rebutting results of Dr Yu. Zilberter’s group  (all references are in the post you’ve mentioned ) did not indeed reproduce SOME of the results – but then they did not try to reproduce the experimental conditions, so how are we supposed to compare? On the other hand, Ivanov et al., checked what’s going on in the experimental conditions used by their opponents and were able to show that the differences are easily explainable. The parts 2 to 4 of the “Sweet and sour recipes for the brain” will discuss the differences one by one, from acidification to oxygenation to slice handling.

Importantly, two of the three opponent’s articles did reproduce results of Yu. Zilberter with coworkers (concerning pyruvate and lactate) however interpreting them in the way that will also be elucidated in the series and that has been already discussed in our review article (Zilberter et al., 2010) by the time when the interpretation was published, e.g., Tyzio et al., 2011.

Hope it helps,

Tanya Zilberter

Paradoxical sleep phase or sleep apnea?

Neuroscience FAQ, Q&A — Tags: , — 5:12 am

About these Q&A :: Q&A Category


Question: I have had an occasional dream that I cannot explain. In my dream I hear something whether it be a humming or a scream, that increases in volume to the point where I try to wake up because it is so loud and frightening. My body is completely paralyzed and I cannot wake up or open my eyes. So i have to hear the sound volume in my dream go from low to really high. As much as I try to wake up and try to stop the sound I have no control over it. What might be causing this type of dream that has begun since childhood?

Answer


Dear Lissette,

What time of the night does it usually happen? How do you feel after you finally wake up? Any heart pounding, hyperventilation, dizziness, fear? How soon can you calm down? Does it correlate with your daytime events causing stress? How would you assess your total well being? Do you have experience of ringing in the ears? The last alone can initiate your dream if it occurs during so called paradoxical phase of sleep when weak signals are perceived as strong and the other way around. Finally, I would check up with your doctor regarding sleep apnea, which can cause unpleasant dreams and nocturnal panic attacks.

Tanya Zilberter

Shall we ever use all of the brain?

About these Q&A :: Q&A Category


Question

Is it true that if humans learned to use all of the brain, we could carry on as just energy? What I mean is, could brains function without a body?

Answer

Tiara,

I would be happy if we could but we cannot as far as I am concerned. The brain seems to be a hardware and as such can only function with physical support of bodily mechanisms while controlling and coordinating those mechanisms.

A slightly different (although the difference is not practical so far) is the question: can mind(s) do whatever it/they do without the body. The idea behind is called “one mind” theory or the theory of non-local nature of mind.

As to the energy part of your question, what kind of energy do you have in mind?

Please read more here:

The theories of mind

Energy substrates and neuroprotection: what does what

Tanya Zilberter

Cannabinoids, marijuana – health effects

Question: Hi. Please, before you claim this as outside of your expertise I would really appreciate your answer even if it is only a little information, you can send it to my email privately at too if you wish. So, I was wondering, what does marijuana do to our bodies and brains? How dangerous can it be?

I’m only asking because i smoked for 2 years then stopped for 3, and now I am doing it for a few weeks, not for recreational reasons though. And when I did it a few days ago my heart was pounding like crazy, I felt like I was going to die and I was thinking some crazy thoughts, and so I’m just trying to make sure i’ll be safe if I continue for the next few weeks?

I’m 19 and male. Thank you.

Answer: Dear Josh,

I’m listing the major known negative reactions caused by marijuana. Since I know neither the purpose of your return to marijuana nor your overall health condition, you must draw your own conclusions. Please don’t hesitate asking me any further questions especially if you find my reply too technical.

The plant Cannabis sativa has been used for or medical and religious purposes for at least over 4000 years and has been globally adopted for recreational use for the past 50 years. It’s been estimated that 166 million adults aged 15–64 years currently use cannabis. The psychoactive chemical of cannabis is Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The deadly dose of THC is between 15 g and 70 g — much higher than that can be smoked by even a heavy user.

The most common acute negative reactions are frequent in beginning users. They are: anxiety, panic reactions including tachycardia (fast heart beat), and psychotic symptoms. Chronic users can suffer from memory deficits, motor performance impairment; as a result, cannabis users had higher rates of hospital admission for injury from all causes although alcohol intake has greater impact: driving after having taken cannabis increases the risk of vehicle crashes 2–3 times compared with 6–15 times under the influence of alcohol.

Other adverse effects include decreased levels of testosterone and increased rates of birth defects in babies born to mothers taken cannabis during pregnancy.

The lifetime risk of dependence in cannabis users is about 9% comparing with 32% for nicotine, 23% for heroin, 17% for cocaine, 15% for alcohol, and 11% for stimulant users.

Cannabis smoke contains many of the same carcinogens as does tobacco smoke so it’s no surprise that case–control study of hospital-diagnosed lung cancer and community controls indicated an increased incidence of lung cancer in cannabis users even after adjustment for cigarette smoking.

Cannabis use changes brain functions that can be detected by modern methods like positron emission tomography, and electroencephalography. Among most reproducible effects of cannabis withdrawal are: lower brain blood flow in certain regions of brain  cortex,  less activity in brain regions involved in memory and attention and changes in cannabinoid receptor activity in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum.

Tanya Zilberter

Source

W Hall, L Degenhardt. Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet 2009; 374: 1383–91

Older Posts » To leave a comment or question click here