Toxic glycolysis and brain aging

Related article: Prescription-strength stress as a medicine

The intermittent glycolysis during fasting, physical exercise, and stress may delay senescence by lowering intracellular concentration of methylglyoxal, a common intermediate in the Maillard reaction (glycation).

A simple logic allows to imagine that a situation when food is available to an animal at all times and in any quantities should be very seldom. In real life, there are seasons when food is abundant and seasons when it’s scarce. To smoothen the energy delivery to vital organs, there all kind of depots, most famous (or rather infamous for us human beings in Western societies) is the fat depot, having practically unlimited capacity. There is clinical evidence that a human body can save in this depot enough energy to feed itself for a year. Vitamins and electrolyte fluids should be adequately supplied of course, but no calories enter the body – and it survives!

The opposite situation, when animals are allowed to eat as much as they can, as often as they can, is called ad libitum (AL). In experiments on beneficial effects of calorie restriction (CR), the food intake in the AL situation is taken for 100% and then different percentages of restrictions are applied to see CR effectiveness to slow down the process of aging, especially brain aging.

In an early study of the energy metabolism McCarter and Palmer (1) interesting differences were revealed, between rats fed CR diets and those fed the same food but AL. Although in both groups energy metabolism was mostly glycolytic, taping in carbohydrate metabolic way, CR very soon after feeding switched to using their bodies’ fat reserves with their glycolysis suppressed, while the AL group maintained practically non-stop glycolysis.

So it’s been suggested that that the beneficial effects of CR could be due to suppression of glycolysis and in experiments of Walker et al. (2) and Partridge and Brand (3) the question of whether the shortened life-span of AL animals results from some metabolic toxicity, specifically whether glycolysis is deleterious but possibly hormetic (4)

The hormesis hypotheses by Masoro (5) and Sinclair (6) suggests that intermittent stress may induce synthesis of long-term protective functions. Glycolytic intermediates dihydroxyacetone- and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphates are form methylglyoxal (MG), which is potentially toxic.

Hipkiss (7) suggested that non-stop glycolysis is deleterious due to the generation of MG, but periods of glycolysis interruption could be hormetic. MG damages mitochondria and induces a pro-oxidant state characteristics to cellular aging. The decreased glycolysis during CR may delay senescence by lowering intracellular MG concentration compared to AL animals.

Sources

1. Am. J. Physiol. 1992 263, E448-E452

2. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005 126, 929-937

3. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005 126, 911-912

4. Hormesis – An effect in which a toxic substance acts like a stimulant in small doses, but it is an inhibitor in large doses.

5. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005 126, 913-922

6. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005 126, 987-1002.

7. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2006 127 8-15

Glucose versus lactate in immature brain slices

Related Q&A: Y Ben-Ari writes that ‘Zilberter and Bregestovski and colleagues’ dealt with ‘ketone body metabolites’. What does ketone body metabolite mean? ”

About this post

1. These quotes were first used by Elly Strammer at F1000.com. After she agreed to remove her post from there, she contacted us suggesting that we use the quotes. We thank Elly for her contribution and for further commenting at the Naturally Selected

2. We received many questions regarding this post, quite a few of them concerned the formatting, which was not helping to clearly understand the issue. Because of that, we updated the post making sure to visually indicate quotes belonging to the arguing sides (according to F1000.comNow, remarks related to comments concerning the works of Y. Zilberter et al. are marked as  and remarks by Y. Ben-Ari are marked as 

 ”We demonstrate that in the neonatal brain, Em [membrane potential] and EGABA [reversal potential of GABA-induced anionic currents] strongly depend on composition of the energy substrate pool. Complementing glucose with ketone bodies, pyruvate or lactate resulted in a significant hyperpolarization of both Em and EGABA, and induced a radical shift in the mode of GABAergic synaptic transmission towards network inhibition.” (1)

“The main conclusions of our work are that the inhibitory effect of L-lactate on GDPs is not mediated by mitochondrial energy metabolism, and that glucose at its standard 10 mM concentration is an adequate energy substrate for neonatal neurons in vitro.” (2)

 ”We show that in the presence of glucose, lactate is effectively utilized as an energy substrate, causing an augmentation of oxidative metabolism. Moreover, in the absence of glucose lactate is fully capable of maintaining synaptic function. Therefore, during network activity in neonatal slices, lactate can be an efficient energy substrate capable of sustaining and enhancing aerobic energy metabolism.” (3)

“Lactate is not an efficient replacement for glucose and, as in vivo glucose is always kept at 4-5mM in the brain even in conditions of severe stress.” (4 a)

“The fact is, in the extracellular fluid (ECF) in the brain, glucose concentration is between 1.9 mM and 0.59 while lactate concentration is between 5.1 mM and 0.78 mM (for review, see [9 in this post]). The question arises: why 10 mM glucose in standard ACSF is adequate but 10 mM lactate is not.” (5)

“Clearly, the suggestions of Zilberter and colleagues rely on wrong assumptions and results that have not been reproduced.” (4 a)

“The effect of weak acids on GABA reversal potential and GDP generation was initially described for 4-5 mM concentrations of BHB [ketone body beta-hydroxybutyrate] (Rheims et al. 2009 ), lactate and pyruvate (Holmgren et al. 2010), and was later confirmed by independent research groups for similar concentrations of pyruvate (Tyzio et al. 2011), lactate and propionate (Ruusuvuori et al. 2010).” (6)

“From a clinical perspective, it is interesting to stress that relying on their observations on the positive actions of lactate on metabolism, Zilberter and colleagues have suggested that administration of lactate may be “a novel therapeutic tool to cure Parkinson, Alzheimer, Leigh syndrome and epilepsies” (4a)

 From Brain Fuels: This quotation is taken out of context. The exact piece from (9) reads: “… a growing body of evidence shows that metabolic stress caused by impaired energy homeostasis is a common feature of neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs) such as Alzheimer disease, Leigh syndrome, epilepsy, dementia, multiple sclerosis, neuropathies or ataxias [88] and [89]. We speculate that endogenous ES such as lactate, BHB and pyruvate or their combinations can be efficient in treatingNDD, and would address the cause rather than symptoms. Indeed, the neuroprotective effects of pyruvate have been repeatedly demonstrated in cases of brain ischemia, hypoglycemia, hemorragia, stroke and kainate-inducedepileptic brain damage[90], [91], [92]and [93]. Further research into mechanisms of the effects of ES on fundamental neuronal properties might allow more rapid progress in preventing and managing NDDs.

The comment made on 29 Jul 2011 (4 b) quoted this paragraph with the references removed thus attributing the text solely to (9).

“Considering the compelling and well-known clinical observation that high lactate level is a classical sign of neuron suffering and severe conditions that require rapid intervention, this suggestion is, to say the least, astonishing.” (4 a)

“The bulk of the evidence suggests that lactate is an important intermediary in numerous metabolic processes, a particularly mobile fuel for aerobic metabolism, and perhaps a mediator of redox state among various compartments both within and between cells. Lactate can no longer be considered the usual suspect for metabolic ‘crimes’, but is instead a central player in cellular, regional and whole body metabolism… we might term the period from the 1930s to approximately the early 1970s the dead-end waste product era.” (7)

” It is curious that Dr Zilberter and colleagues refer to metabolism but have never reported measuring it.” (4 b)

“…Ivanov et al. (2011) simultaneously recorded oxygen tension, NAD(P)H fluorescence transients and local field potentials during electrical stimulation of the hippocampal Schaffer collateral pathway in neonatal brain tissue slices from mice. From the very beginning, the authors took great care to ensure both viability and functionality of their preparations. They convincingly demonstrated that surprisingly high superfusion rates with standard artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) in the slice chamber are required to ensure adequate oxygenation and complete electrical function in blood-free tissue slices. An important implication of this methodological tour de force is that under many previously reported experiments the requirements for viability may been met while the functionality may have been compromised.” (8)

References

  1. Holmgren, C. D., Mukhtarov, M., Malkov, A. E., Popova, I. Y., Bregestovski, P., and Zilberter, Y. (2010). Energy substrate availability as a determinant of neuronal resting potential, GABA signaling and spontaneous network activity in the neonatal cortex in vitro. J. Neurochem. 112, 900–912.
  2. Ruusuvuori E et al. (2010). Spontaneous network events driven by depolarizing GABA action in neonatal hippocampal slices are not attributable to deficient mitochondrial energy metabolism. J Neurosci. Nov 17; 30(46):15638-42
  3. Ivanov A, Mukhtarov M, Bregestovski P and Zilberter Y (2011) Lactate effectively covers energy demands during neuronal network activity in neonatal hippocampal slices. Front. Neuroenerg. 3:2.
  4. Ben-Ari Y.  a) Faculty of 1000, 06 Jan 2011, evaluation,  b) 29 Jul 2011, comment.
  5. Zilberter Y. Faculty of 1000, 19 May 2011 and July 14 2011, comments.
  6. Khakhalin A (May 18, 2011). Questioning the depolarizing effects of GABA during early brain development. J Neurophysiol doi: 0.1152/jn.00293.2011.
  7. Mendel I. Faculty of 1000, 04 Jun 2011, comment (Currently the comment is removed).
  8. Kasischke K (2011) Lactate fuels the neonatal brain. Front. Neuroenerg. 3:4. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2011.00004
  9. Zilberter Y, Zilberter T, Bregestovski P. (2010) Neuronal activity in vitro and the in vivo reality: the role of energy homeostasis. Trends PharmacolSci 31:394–401.

Lucid dream – sleep or wakefulness?

Q&A and FAQ (archived) :: Ongoing Q&A :: Neuroscience Q&A and FAQ

 

QUESTION: Hello. I have a question that is somewhat difficult to categorize, but I had thought if anyone could give me a clue to an answer, someone in your field perhaps could, or come close. I was wondering if you could give me an idea about a possible explanation of something I used to experience years ago.

In case it may help, I was born three and a half months premature.  I was, (as many babies born like me) incubated for quite some time. I’m twenty-five now, with some autistic-related symptoms and  an learning disability – particularly with information processing (tasks, directions, math, etc). When I was a young child (it’s difficult to recall the age, five or six perhaps), I frequently would lie awake in bed (as I often would, being an insomniac) early in the morning or before sleep with particular “visions”, often holograms of three-dimensional, geometric designs. These designs would appear as geometric shapes often very similar to a computer chip, (or something similar with the same type of intricate lines or basic shape). The image would start off at a relatively normal “distance”, and then “zoom” closer, like a video camera zooming in on an object from above. At other times the image was like flying through space. Regarding the “computer chip” example, if you have ever seen the original “Tron” 1980s film, when  one of the characters is being transported to the computer world – and the geometric designs that ensue – That is nearly exactly what I experienced. (For the record, I’d never heard of Tron until about three years ago, which I now love, of course).

As I grew older, the images I would see stopped being literal holograms and resorted to visions I would see in my mind’s eye sometimes when I would close my eyes. I still experience this. There is no particular pattern, and it can happen at any moment I choose to shut my eyes. Sometimes I can will it to happen through focus.

Interestingly, my fiancé experienced the same thing when he was about the same age. (He wouldn’t lie about this and his parents confirmed it). He has always been high functioning autistic, but when he was two and a half he had an accident involving suffocation that has affected the emotional parts of his brain. The only difference between his experiences and mine were that his were not literal holograms, and (separate from the geometric shapes) he would also hallucinate tiny green worms (this stopped for him years ago

Based on your knowledge, what do you think this could have been (in my experience and in my fiancé’s) and why?

Thank you for reading my question (I apologize for any lengthiness). I appreciate your answer to a strange question. I hope you find it as interesting as I do.

ANSWER: Dear Kara,

Thank you for your interesting question and wonderful, poetic description of your experience!

I can see two, maybe different, maybe not so different parts in your question. One is about lucid dreams, the other is about autistic-related symptoms.

It seems that from the neuroscience standpoint, brain areas involved in these two parts overlap. Thus, during lucid dreams, brain cortex activity changes bidirectionally: activity in the prefrontal area (dealing among other things with decision-making and willful actions) is decreased while parietal cortex (e.g., busy with visual processing) is activated (1) – and both are involved in the autistic-related symptoms (2).

Also, the overlapping area involved in the both in autism-related symptoms and dreaming is the brain stem responsible for transmission of information from sensory inputs to the higher levels of brain, where the information is processed finally generating true or imaginative picture of the world. During lucid dreams, since the willful control is loosened, it may form basic patterns like abstract shapes and their movements. The fact that your fiancé experienced the same thing might support this suggestion meaning that it indeed might relate to properties of the brain during sleep when the brain have structural and functional peculiarities, in your case also similar with your fiancé. Just my 2 cents.

Please don’t hesitate asking me further questions if I my answer is not completely satisfactory.

Tanya Zilberter

Sources

1. Hobson, J.A. 2009. “REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness”. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 10, 1–11.

2. Neurobiology of autism-related conditions: http://agelessbrain.com/2011/06/neurobiology-of-autism-related-conditions/

QUESTION-2:

 

Thank you so much for your fascinating, detailed answer. Though I do want to make sure I understand you correctly, if that is OK with you.

I am assuming that you recall I stated that I was fully awake when I had these experiences? I know that sometimes dreaming can seem like reality, but I know I was certainly awake – I had not even begun to fall asleep yet (and my for my fiancé it was the same). Were you saying that I was perhaps asleep and didn’t realize it?

Assuming that I was indeed awake, what could this have been? Or did I miss something? I hope my clarification-question hasn’t been of any inconvenience. Thanks.

ANSWER- 2

I cannot be completely sure whether your description means that you were having lucid dreams but I cannot exclude it. The matter is, lucid dream is a dream, in which one is aware about dreaming but is capable of influencing the “plot” of the dream. Because of that, it has been assumed that the dreamer is in fact awake. However, later quite a few researchers recorded eye movements and showed that lucid dreaming is the rapid eye movement phase of real sleep.

From my personal experience, before I really fell asleep, I often find myself watching how my thoughts take their own direction while my role narrows to mere watching, mostly with some pleasure though I cannot explain why it’s pleasant. Do I sleep during this period of time? I don’t know. What I do know is that, for example, Dmitri Mendeleev in 1869 saw his periodical table of elements, whole and complete, in a similar dream. The greatest hit “Yesterday” came to Paul McCartney in a dream, as happened to the idea of chemical transmission of the nervous impulse, for which Dr Loewi won the Nobel Prize for medicine in 1936.  I must say, I do not consider myself belonging to this brilliant company <sigh> but I can imagine that these brilliant thoughts came in these great people’s minds through a similar mechanism.

One more thing. With sleep as well as with dieting, there’s the tendency to misreport while being completely sincere. Only impartial lab recording can tell for sure and such recording show that people with sleep problems often sleep more than they think, same way as dieters underreport their calorie intake and overreport their exercise intensity and duration.

Thank you very much for this interesting discussion!

Tanya Zilberter

Sweet and sour recipes for the brain 4. “Physiological” concentrations: what and where?

What concentrations are physiological and what are not (usually called pharmacological)? The physiological ones  normally refer to the levels of a substance relevant to the naturally occurring, which, logically, for neurons is the milieu they strive in. It is called extracellular fluid (ECF) and is notorious for dramatic differences with not only blood (plasma) but even with the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

“Importantly, microdialysis data have shown that both in adult humans and in rats,the basal glucose levels are about 1–2 mM in the ECF of the neocortex and hippocampus [32,33,37,38] compared with 5–7 mM in the blood, whereas concentrations of lactate are about 2–5 mM in the ECF [32,34,39,40] compared with 1–2 mM in the adult blood.” (Zilberter et al., 2010). The authors further stressed the imperative of providing adequate means for energy substrates to be utilized in the artificial milieu, in which brain slices are placed:

“In brain slices, energy deficiency cannot be managed in the same way as in whole-body homeostasis, resulting in higher ES levels in  slices than in vivo. The importance of a proper oxygen supply should be stressed [55], because oxidative phosphorylation is proportional to the presence of O2. Therefore, at an inadequate oxygen level, the efficacy of ES might be negligible. It is not surprising that energy metabolism in slices differs from that occurring in the living brain, and is probably impaired [52–54].”

Khakhalin (2011) wrote in his recent review that effects of ES on GABA action has been shown for “…4-5  mM concentrations of beta-hydroxybutyrate  (Rheims et al. 2009), lactate and pyruvate (Holmgren et al. 2010), and was later confirmed by independent research groups for similar concentrations of pyruvate (Tyzio et al. 2011), and lactate (Ruusuvuori et al. 2010).” He continued arguing whether  the concentrations were  ”physiological ” in the experiments showing equal results in different authors who made, however, different conclusions: Tyzio et al. state that the physiological concentration of pyruvate is 1.6 – the one they measured in plasma.

“This comparison may be not valid, however, as it is well known from microdialysis studies that the extracellular fluid, immediately surrounding neural cells, differs in its composition not only from the blood plasma, but even from the cerebrospinal fluid. In particular, concentration of lactate in the extracellular fluid of rats and humans was found to be 2-5 times higher than in the blood plasma… 4-5 mM concentrations are likely to be physiologically relevant… On the other hand, at these concentrations both lactate and pyruvate induce noticeable changes in GABA- and glutamatergic transmission in developing neural networks. It means that some changes in experimental protocols and related theoretical paradigms may still be necessary.”

Kasischke (2011) in his comment on the article by Ivanov et al., 2011, wrote: “From the very beginning, the authors took great care to ensure both viability and functionality of their preparations.”

“An important implication of this methodological tour de force is that under many previously reported experiments the requirements for viability may been met while the functionality may have been compromised.”

References

 

  1. Zilberter Y, Zilberter T, Bregestovski P. (2010) Neuronal activity in vitro and the in vivo reality: the role of energy homeostasis. Trends Pharmacol Sci., 31(9):394-401
  2. [32,33,3437,38,39,40,52-55]  are cited in Zilberter et al. (2010)
  3. Khakhalin A (May 18, 2011). Questioning the depolarizing effects of GABA during early brain development. J Neurophysiol doi: 0.1152/jn.00293.2011.
  4. Tyzio et al. (2011) and  Ruusuvuori et al. (2010) are cited in Khakhalin ( 2011).
  5. Kasischke K (2011). Lactate fuels the neonatal brain. Frontiers in Neuroenergetics; 3, 4

“Brain metabolism in vitro” and those sour energy substrates

This paper suggests that the developmental switch in the reversal potential for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is regulated by different energy sources

This paper suggests that the developmental switch in the reversal potential for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is regulated by different energy sources

An evaluation of our article (1) appeared in the “Faculty of 1000 postpublication peer reviews” the conclusion being:

The findings of Rheims et al. have a potentially major impact on our understanding of GABAergic function during development, bringing back an element of inhibition in developing neuronal networks that appeared to rely entirely on excitatory connections (2).

This article (1) along with the article (3) later became an indirect subject of another evaluation (4) although formally, the evaluation concerned a different paper (5), which has been commended because (the author’s words):

“It settles an important issue related to brain metabolism in vitro and the role of acidification in brain patterns.”

The acidification issue doesn’t seem to be resolved either in 5 nor in 4, so a comment to the evaluation appeared in May 2011,  stating among other things the following:

We showed that inhibition of spontaneous network activity in neonatal hippocampal slices by energy substrates is not correlated with intracellular acidification (7) and that they work altering intrinsic features of energy metabolism namely NAD(P)H and oxygen utilization (8).

Another data challenged in 5 is whether lactate as efficient as an energy substrate: “Lactate is not an efficient replacement for glucose” wrote Dr Ben-Ari and Y. Zilberter in his comment referred to the paper 8 titled “Lactate effectively covers energy demands during neuronal network activity in neonatal hippocampal slices” and the work of Wyss et al. (9) titled “In Vivo Evidence for Lactate as a Neuronal Energy Source”.

References

1. Rheims S, Holmgren CD, Chazal G, Mulder J, Harkany T, Zilberter T, Zilberter Y. (2009) J Neurochem.  Aug;110(4):1330-8. Epub 2009 Jun 22. (on Brain Fuels)

2. Scimemi A, Diamond J: 2009. F1000.com/1166168

3. Holmgren CD, Mukhtarov M, Malkov AE, Popova IY, Bregestovski P, Zilberter Y. (2010) J Neurochem. Feb;112(4):900-12. Epub 2009 Nov 24. (on Brain Fuels)

4. Ben-Ari Y: 2011. F1000.com/6913961

5. Ruusuvuori E, Kirilkin I, Pandya N, Kaila K (2010) J Neurosci.  Nov 17; 30(46):15638-42

6. Zilberter Y, Zilberter T, Bregestovski P. (2010) Trends Pharmacol Sci., 31(9):394-401 (on Brain Fuels)

7. Mukhtarov, M., Ivanov, A., Zilberter, Y., and Bregestovski, P. (2011) J Neurochem 116, 316-321

8. Ivanov A, Mukhtarov M, Bregestovski P and Zilberter Y (2011) Front. Neuroenerg. 3:2.

9. Wyss M, Jolivet R, Buck A, Magistretti P, and Weber B. (2011)  J Neuroscience, 31(20):7477-7485

The metabolic rate of plasma-borne lactate is a function of brain lactate concentration

In the Journal club section of the Journal of Neuroscience (written exclusively by graduate students or postdoctoral fellows), a review by C. Figley from Johns Hopkins University and Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland was recently published, concluding: “…neurons are capable of transporting and metabolizing large quantities of lactate in vivo” and “…cultured neurons might preferentially oxidize lactate as their primary metabolic substrate”

Chase R. Figley. Human Brain: Implications for the Astrocyte-Neuron Lactate Shuttle Hypothesis. J Neuroscience, 2011, 31(13): 4768-4770; doi: 10.1523/​JNEUROSCI.6612-10.2011




Placebo: a medicine created by the mind

The word placebo initially meant “I will please”: “Placebo Domino in regione vivorum” (“I shall please the Lord in the land of the living,” referring to the Latin translation of the Bible by Jerome, Psalms, Septuagint, 1). Practically, it means something like sugar pills known to have effects similar to a real medicine while being biologically inactive. The placebo effect is so strong that it’s a standard to exclude its influence when a drug is being tested. Not only patients but also their physicians must be unaware of what kind of pills is given to whom, a procedure called double-blind control.

Until mid-20th century, placebo used to be a common practice although it was considered genuinely ineffective from therapeutic standpoint. The belief was that intelligent patients were less prone to benefit from it (2). Currently, there’s a solid body of evidence that in many cases placebo effect closely minicks that of pharmacologically active drugs, for instance, Ramipril versus placebo (3) reduced the rates of death from:

  • cardiovascular causes – 6.1 % vs 8.1 %
  • myocardial infarction – 9.9 % vs. 12.3 %
  • stroke 3.4 % vs. 4.9 %
  • complications related to diabetes 6.4 % vs. 7.6 %

Interestingly, in children, effects of placebo is 2-fold higher than in adults (4).

In the article “Placebo-Induced Changes in fMRI in the Anticipation and Experience of Pain” (5) the authors reported data supporting the hypothesis that placebo works via decrease in neuronal activity in brain regions sensitive to pain. They concluded: These findings provide strong refutation of the conjecture that placebo responses reflect nothing more than report bias (6)”

A very good video-summary of placebo effect: The Strange Powers of the Placebo Effect

Sources

1. J R Soc Med. 2000 April; 93(4): 213–214.
2. J R Soc Med. 1999 October; 92(10): 511–515.
3. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53.
4. PLoS Med 5(8): e166. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050166
5. Science 20 February 2004:
Vol. 303 no. 5661 pp. 1162-1167
6. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1594 (2001).

Shall we ever use all of the brain?

About these Q&A :: Q&A Category


Question

Is it true that if humans learned to use all of the brain, we could carry on as just energy? What I mean is, could brains function without a body?

Answer

Tiara,

I would be happy if we could but we cannot as far as I am concerned. The brain seems to be a hardware and as such can only function with physical support of bodily mechanisms while controlling and coordinating those mechanisms.

A slightly different (although the difference is not practical so far) is the question: can mind(s) do whatever it/they do without the body. The idea behind is called “one mind” theory or the theory of non-local nature of mind.

As to the energy part of your question, what kind of energy do you have in mind?

Please read more here:

The theories of mind

Energy substrates and neuroprotection: what does what

Tanya Zilberter

Mirror neurons, autism, and the theory of mind

Related: Schrödinger’s One Mind :: Non-local mind bibliography

The theory of mind presumes that we can only imagine that others have a mind because we have no direct access to the mind of another. In the late 1980s, this theory seemed to be fortified by experimental data describing a population of brain cells (named by researchers “mirror neurons”) – becoming active when a monkey watched another animal act – where first described.

Mirror neurons or, in humans, mirror brain areas, are those that act similarly whether a subject of experiment perform an action or sees how the same act is performed by another being. Recently, the experiments were extended to analyze emphatic reactions (Seeing someone is in pain, seeing the faces of people in pain, seeing hands or feet in painful situations). Click to see the picture 1 and picture 2.

The enthusiasts see in these facts many hopes: to pinpoint in the brain’s hardware the processes of understanding, altruism, decision making, to finally grasp what’s wrong in the brain of the autistic, etc. The skeptics call for stricter analysis and interpretation. The major problem with mirror neurons, they say are: the lack of evidence that these neurons relate, as implicated, to understanding or language, different anatomical representation in monkeys and humans and between understanding and acting in both, and some other discrepancies that are very technical.

Sources

C Keysers, JH. Kaas, V Gazzola. Somatosensation in social perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v 11, 2010: 417

talkingbrains.org

Schrödinger’s One Mind

“I should say: the overall number of minds is just one.” — Erwin Schrödinger

Erwin Schrödinger, one of the founder of modern physics, was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1933 for his revolutionary work in quantum physics. On the other hand, he was attracted to the ancient Greek and Hindu philosophies, e.g., Vedanta, and Upanishads.

Larry Dossey in his editorial “CAM, Religion, and Schrödinger’s One Mind” wrote about “new” view of the nature of mind:

” [A] new view of consciousness — not actually new, but an ancient view that is being newly supported through solid science. This is where the views of the physicist Schrödinger … become useful” (2). Dossey continued, “the extent of Schrödinger’s holism can be shocking; … he quotes a Sufi mystic of 13th-century Persia:”

The spiritual world is one single spirit who stands like unto a light behind the bodily world and who, when any single creature comes into being, shines through it as through a window. According to the kind and size of the window less or more light enters the world. The light itself however remains unchanged.”(1)

1. Schrödinger E. What is Life? (and Mind and Matter). London, England: Cambridge University Press; 1969

2. Explore, V 7, 1, Pp. 1-7 (Jan 2011)

Older Posts » To leave a comment or question click here